{"id":171312,"date":"2024-12-19T06:25:21","date_gmt":"2024-12-19T05:25:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/det-andet-koen-fylder-75-aar-hvad-kan-vi-bruge-simone-de-beauvoir-til-i-dag\/"},"modified":"2025-03-12T13:34:56","modified_gmt":"2025-03-12T12:34:56","slug":"the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/","title":{"rendered":"‘The Second Sex’ turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant?"},"content":{"rendered":"

This is a translated version of an interview made i Danish.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00bbShould I light up?\u00ab Anna Cornelia Ploug asks, pointing to her pipe, which I have asked her to take with her for our photo shoot.<\/p>\n

\u00bbPlease do,\u00ab I reply, it would actually look cool.<\/p>\n

\u00bbI don’t have any regular tobacco,\u00ab she then concludes, and without going into the meaning of that, we agree to keep the pipe unlit.<\/p>\n

Anna Cornelia Ploug is a postdoc at the Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics (NorS), University of Copenhagen (UCPH), where she is doing research on how the humanities address the major challenges facing society.<\/p>\n

However, that is not what I have come to talk to her about today. We are to talk about someone who you sense is the young researcher\u2019s professional idol: the French writer, feminist and philosopher Simone de Beauvoir, whose main work The Second Sex<\/em> turns 75 this year.<\/p>\n

A misunderstood one-liner<\/h1>\n

The idea for the work was not Beauvoir’s own at all, it turns out:<\/p>\n

\u00bbIt was her friend Colette Audry, who for many years had been talking about writing a great work about womanhood,\u00ab says Anna Cornelia Ploug.<\/p>\n

\u00bbBut Colette didn’t have time for it because she was so politically active in the women\u2019s struggle herself,\u00ab she laughs.<\/p>\n

Beauvoir wasn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

\u00bbBeauvoir wrote this tome about the question of being a woman, but she had never herself felt to be the object of discrimination on the basis of her gender, or experienced it as a problem in any way,\u00ab says Anna Cornelia Ploug.<\/p>\n

\u00bbShe actually wanted to avoid talking about it. But she didn’t quite succeed in avoiding it.\u00ab<\/p>\n

Feminism has become so mainstream that almost everyone is now a feminist<\/p>\n

Anna Cornelia Ploug, postdoc at NorS<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The Second Sex<\/em> is a work which is associated with many stories, myths and opinions. The Pope condemned it, Franco banned it, and it was the cause of a big stir and outcry wherever it became available.<\/p>\n

It can even infuriate people nowadays, says Anna Cornelia Ploug, citing as an example the two centre-right pundits Eva and Rune Selsing, who in their book Den Borgerlige Orden<\/em> [The Bourgeois Order] from 2022 call The Second Sex<\/em> \u00bba blowtorch directed against bourgeois society\u00ab.<\/p>\n

Anna Cornelia Ploug somewhat ironically calls it ‘the bible of modern feminism’.<\/p>\n

\u00bbYes, and that’s a terrible clich\u00e9. A real platitude.\u00ab<\/p>\n

But she will defend it, she says:<\/p>\n

\u00bbBecause it is also the case with the Bible that many have it on their shelves, but how many have actually read it? People think they know what it says, and there are a lot of rumours about what it says. Great conflicts, wars and battles are fought over it. But in many ways, it’s also just a symbol.\u00ab<\/p>\n

It is the same with The Second Sex<\/em>. There is disagreement about the interpretation of the book, and its arguments are often oversimplified.<\/p>\n

Most people will be familiar with the idea that \u00bbyou are not born a woman, you become one.\u00ab It is often cited as the book’s most important sentence and as a one-liner about gender being the result of a series of performative actions.<\/p>\n

But according to Anna Cornelia Ploug, this is a misunderstanding of the sentence itself, and is actually not the book’s main point at all.<\/p>\n

\u00bbI don’t believe the sentence is just about an individual’s gradual gendering process, as it is often interpreted,\u00ab she says.<\/p>\n

\u00bbWhat it actually expresses is that becoming a ‘woman’ means taking on a logical position where your autonomy as a free human being is in opposition to being a gendered being.\u00ab<\/p>\n

The lived experience<\/h1>\n

As the book’s title also indicates, Beauvoir’s analysis is that while the man is the norm, the woman is the other. The woman becomes the object that enables the man to create himself as a subject.<\/p>\n

In this way, the woman is never something in her own right, but only by virtue of her relationship with the man. And it is precisely this idea of ‘otherness’ that would be of great importance to later thinkers.<\/p>\n

\u00bbThe book helps establish what we now know as Women’s Studies, which becomes Gender Studies, and then related subjects like Critical Race Studies, and later Queer Studies and Disability Studies. In a way, it lays the foundation for a whole new way of thinking,\u00ab says Ploug.<\/p>\n

Beauvoir reaches her conclusions by reviewing the view of what a woman is in biology, religion, philosophy, psychoanalysis and literature. But one of the things she also does is include women’s lived experience in her analysis.<\/p>\n

In this way, the book contributes to a ‘turn towards concrete experience’ \u2013 where philosophy begins to take an interest in precisely the lived experience of people.<\/p>\n

\u00bbThis along with another important book actually written by Beauvoir’s personal friend, Frantz Fanon,\u00ab says Ploug.<\/p>\n

The book she mentions here is the postcolonial thinker and revolutionary Frantz Fanon’s book Black Skin, White Masks, which was written in 1952 and at the same time as The Second Sex<\/em>.<\/p>\n

It is about Fanon\u2019s experience of being racialized in Paris after traveling to France from the French colony of Martinique.<\/p>\n

\u00bbInstead of the woman, in Fanon ‘the other’ is the Black, it is the otherness of the Colonized and the Racialized that he shines a light on. But the dialectical way of thinking is the same, and they both form the cornerstones of the critical disciplines,\u00ab says Ploug.<\/p>\n

\u00bbIt’s great that this book is finally in Danish,\u00ab she adds, referring to its recent first-time Danish-language publication.<\/p>\n

It’s all about critique<\/h1>\n

A key question in Gender Studies and in similar theoretical approaches is which methodological approach is politically useful. Should we fight for equality, or for liberation, inclusion and overthrow of the system itself?<\/p>\n

And here Beauvoir’s work reminds us of the critique as a method, Anna Cornelia Ploug reckons.<\/p>\n

\u00bbFeminism has become so mainstream that almost everyone is now a feminist\u00ab says Anna Cornelia Ploug.<\/p>\n

Feminist thinking is a critique in itself, in its essence. It is not that women should have more board positions<\/p>\n

Anna Cornelia Ploug, postdoc at NorS<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00bbAnd we’re happy about that \u2014 that’s what we work for \u2014 but of course there is a downside to this.\u00ab<\/p>\n

The downside is that the concept risks being watered down and we forget what feminist practice actually consists of: Namely, to analyse and break down the structures in society that keep people stuck in unfreedom.<\/p>\n

\u00bbIt is important to remember. Feminist thought is its essence critique. It is not that women should have more board positions.\u00ab<\/p>\n

The Second Sex<\/em> is not a political manifesto, Anna Cornelia Ploug says. A manifesto is a positive programme that presents a vision of how something should be: For example, that women should be paid the same as men.<\/p>\n

\u00bbInstead of asking how women can access certain funds in the economic system, you should criticize the economy at its very root. Radically, fundamentally.\u00ab<\/p>\n

[Danish writer] Emma Holten is a good contemporary example, according to Ploug. In May, she published a book called Underskud<\/em> [Deficit], which criticizes the current economic system for not taking the value of caregiving into account.<\/p>\n

Another example could be the discussion of canonic lists in different disciplines. That is, whether there should be more women or other underrepresented groups in the literary or cultural canon, for example.<\/p>\n

\u00bbBut why do we even have a canon at all? Is it set in stone or what’s going on? We have to break that order,\u00ab Ploug says.<\/p>\n

Beauvoir does not say anything concrete about how things should be. She provides a tool for analysing and conducting an ideological critique of society as it actually appears. It is not about giving directions, but about giving a correct description of the current system.<\/p>\n

\u00bbAnd it is then up to the acting political subject to act against it.\u00ab<\/p>\n

Gender is and will remain a problem<\/h1>\n

It is therefore not the answers that Beauvoir offers herself in her work, but rather the method by which she reaches them, that continues to make the work relevant today.<\/p>\n

\u00bbIt’s not so much about the woman per se. It’s about the woman as a prism to point to gender as a problem in the first place.\u00ab<\/p>\n

Will people be provoked by this nowadays \u2014 when many people speak of multiple genders \u2014 that precisely women should be the prism?<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00bbYes, yes. And she probably isn’t a prism nowadays. But she was \u2013 as that’s where the zeitgeist was at the time. And we couldn’t have done without this contribution.\u00ab<\/p>\n

You shouldn’t grab and open The Second Sex<\/em>, take the book’s concept of woman and go out and make a new women’s movement for 2024 on that basis, according to Ploug. The book should be used as a philosophical-critical toolbox instead.<\/p>\n

Being a gendered being \u2013 whether you call yourself a woman, non-binary or something else \u2013 still contains inherent conflicts that we will continue to have to deal with. And Beauvoir helps us see that.<\/p>\n

\u00bbWe need to insist on the unfinished project. Instead of believing that the problem will be solved if only we adopt the liberal stance that everyone is free to choose his or her own identity. This is not taking gender seriously as a problem.\u00ab<\/p>\n

And that’s why we should read The Second Sex now?<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00bbYes. Among other reasons. There are many reasons to read it!,\u00ab the Beauvoir fan laughs.<\/p>\n

\u00bbBut you have to remember that what we can use the book for these days, is not for its ‘results’, if you can put it that way. It is for its method.\u00ab
\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

You can’t use this book as a blueprint for a new women’s movement. But you can read it to remind yourself what feminism essentially is.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":100,"featured_media":174663,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[7519,7520,7521,7522,7523,5459,7524,1948,1255,7525],"class_list":["post-171312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science","tag-75-aar-en","tag-anna-cornelia-ploug-en","tag-beauvoir-en","tag-bibelen-en","tag-det-andet-koen-en","tag-feminisme-en","tag-hovedvaerk-en","tag-jubilaeum-en","tag-kritik-en","tag-simone-de-beauvoir-en","expression-news_article"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\n'The Second Sex\u2019 turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant? \u2014 University Post<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"'The Second Sex\u2019 turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant? \u2014 University Post\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"You can't use this book as a blueprint for a new women's movement. But you can read it to remind yourself what feminism essentially is.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"University Post\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uniavis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-19T05:25:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-12T12:34:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/dscf4932-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1352\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mathilde Meile\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/dscf4932-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Uniavisen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Uniavisen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mathilde Meile\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Mathilde Meile\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/65426f96d50cb624faa90a21753339d8\"},\"headline\":\"‘The Second Sex’ turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant?\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-19T05:25:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-12T12:34:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1634,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"75 \u00e5r\",\"anna cornelia ploug\",\"beauvoir\",\"bibelen\",\"det andet k\u00f8n\",\"feminisme\",\"hovedv\u00e6rk\",\"Jubil\u00e6um\",\"kritik\",\"simone de beauvoir\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Science\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/\",\"name\":\"'The Second Sex\u2019 turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant? \u2014 University Post\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-19T05:25:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-12T12:34:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/65426f96d50cb624faa90a21753339d8\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":825,\"caption\":\"Collage by Eftertryk Magasin after photograph of Simone de Beauvoir, 1952.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"‘The Second Sex’ turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/\",\"name\":\"University Post\",\"description\":\"Independent of management\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/65426f96d50cb624faa90a21753339d8\",\"name\":\"Mathilde Meile\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f273040465f07e12ea8b68d0a840654e3628b7bbbfcd4c99903f24a8b165bc6f?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f273040465f07e12ea8b68d0a840654e3628b7bbbfcd4c99903f24a8b165bc6f?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f273040465f07e12ea8b68d0a840654e3628b7bbbfcd4c99903f24a8b165bc6f?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Mathilde Meile\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/author\\\/mathilde-meile\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"'The Second Sex\u2019 turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant? \u2014 University Post","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"'The Second Sex\u2019 turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant? \u2014 University Post","og_description":"You can't use this book as a blueprint for a new women's movement. But you can read it to remind yourself what feminism essentially is.","og_url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/","og_site_name":"University Post","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uniavis","article_published_time":"2024-12-19T05:25:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-12T12:34:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1352,"url":"http:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/dscf4932-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Mathilde Meile","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_image":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/dscf4932-scaled.jpg","twitter_creator":"@Uniavisen","twitter_site":"@Uniavisen","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mathilde Meile","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/"},"author":{"name":"Mathilde Meile","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#\/schema\/person\/65426f96d50cb624faa90a21753339d8"},"headline":"‘The Second Sex’ turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant?","datePublished":"2024-12-19T05:25:21+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-12T12:34:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/"},"wordCount":1634,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","keywords":["75 \u00e5r","anna cornelia ploug","beauvoir","bibelen","det andet k\u00f8n","feminisme","hovedv\u00e6rk","Jubil\u00e6um","kritik","simone de beauvoir"],"articleSection":["Science"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/","url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/","name":"'The Second Sex\u2019 turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant? \u2014 University Post","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","datePublished":"2024-12-19T05:25:21+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-12T12:34:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#\/schema\/person\/65426f96d50cb624faa90a21753339d8"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","width":1200,"height":825,"caption":"Collage by Eftertryk Magasin after photograph of Simone de Beauvoir, 1952."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"‘The Second Sex’ turns 75: Is Simone de Beauvoir still relevant?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/","name":"University Post","description":"Independent of management","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#\/schema\/person\/65426f96d50cb624faa90a21753339d8","name":"Mathilde Meile","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f273040465f07e12ea8b68d0a840654e3628b7bbbfcd4c99903f24a8b165bc6f?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f273040465f07e12ea8b68d0a840654e3628b7bbbfcd4c99903f24a8b165bc6f?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f273040465f07e12ea8b68d0a840654e3628b7bbbfcd4c99903f24a8b165bc6f?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Mathilde Meile"},"url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/author\/mathilde-meile\/"}]}},"advancedCustomFields":{"expression":{"term_id":15,"name":"News Article","slug":"news_article","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":15,"taxonomy":"expression","description":"","parent":0,"count":11488,"filter":"raw"},"enable_comments":true,"align_content":"alignleft","feature_color":"","article_updated":"","layout_group":[{"acf_fc_layout":"Headline","use_post_title":true,"headline":"","style":"default","highlighted_words":"","text_size":"small"},{"acf_fc_layout":"Image","image":{"ID":174663,"id":174663,"title":"Eftertryk_Magasin_Beauvoir_Illustration","filename":"eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","filesize":141775,"url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","link":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/the-second-sex-turns-75-is-simone-de-beauvoir-still-relevant\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration-2\/","alt":"","author":"100","description":"","caption":"Collage by Eftertryk Magasin after photograph of Simone de Beauvoir, 1952.","name":"eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration-2","status":"inherit","uploaded_to":171312,"date":"2025-03-12 12:30:47","modified":"2025-03-12 12:35:11","menu_order":0,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","type":"image","subtype":"jpeg","icon":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-includes\/images\/media\/default.png","width":1200,"height":825,"sizes":{"thumbnail":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration-150x150.jpg","thumbnail-width":150,"thumbnail-height":150,"medium":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration-480x330.jpg","medium-width":480,"medium-height":330,"medium_large":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration-768x528.jpg","medium_large-width":768,"medium_large-height":528,"large":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","large-width":1200,"large-height":825,"1536x1536":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","1536x1536-width":1200,"1536x1536-height":825,"2048x2048":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","2048x2048-width":1200,"2048x2048-height":825,"featured-soft":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration-290x199.jpg","featured-soft-width":290,"featured-soft-height":199,"featured-hard":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration-290x180.jpg","featured-hard-width":290,"featured-hard-height":180,"narrow":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration-700x481.jpg","narrow-width":700,"narrow-height":481,"extended":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration-990x681.jpg","extended-width":990,"extended-height":681}},"style":"extended","text_placement":"metadata-below","image_link_url":"","image_link_title":"","caption_prefix":"","enable_alternative_caption":true,"alternative_caption":""},{"acf_fc_layout":"Standfirst","subject":"Magnum opus","text":"You can't use this book as a blueprint for a new women's movement. But you can read it to remind yourself what feminism essentially is.","use_post_excerpt":false},{"acf_fc_layout":"Byline","is_author":true,"contributors":false},{"acf_fc_layout":"Content","content":"<p><em>This is a translated version of an interview made i Danish.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u00bbShould I light up?\u00ab Anna Cornelia Ploug asks, pointing to her pipe, which I have asked her to take with her for our photo shoot.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbPlease do,\u00ab I reply, it would actually look cool.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbI don’t have any regular tobacco,\u00ab she then concludes, and without going into the meaning of that, we agree to keep the pipe unlit.<\/p>\n<p>Anna Cornelia Ploug is a postdoc at the Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics (NorS), University of Copenhagen (UCPH), where she is doing research on how the humanities address the major challenges facing society.<\/p>\n<p>However, that is not what I have come to talk to her about today. We are to talk about someone who you sense is the young researcher\u2019s professional idol: the French writer, feminist and philosopher Simone de Beauvoir, whose main work <em>The Second Sex<\/em> turns 75 this year.<\/p>\n<h1>A misunderstood one-liner<\/h1>\n<p>The idea for the work was not Beauvoir’s own at all, it turns out:<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbIt was her friend Colette Audry, who for many years had been talking about writing a great work about womanhood,\u00ab says Anna Cornelia Ploug.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbBut Colette didn’t have time for it because she was so politically active in the women\u2019s struggle herself,\u00ab she laughs.<\/p>\n<p>Beauvoir wasn\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbBeauvoir wrote this tome about the question of being a woman, but she had never herself felt to be the object of discrimination on the basis of her gender, or experienced it as a problem in any way,\u00ab says Anna Cornelia Ploug.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbShe actually wanted to avoid talking about it. But she didn’t quite succeed in avoiding it.\u00ab<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Feminism has become so mainstream that almost everyone is now a feminist<\/p>\n<p class=\"quotee\">Anna Cornelia Ploug, postdoc at NorS<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><em>The Second Sex<\/em> is a work which is associated with many stories, myths and opinions. The Pope condemned it, Franco banned it, and it was the cause of a big stir and outcry wherever it became available.<\/p>\n<p>It can even infuriate people nowadays, says Anna Cornelia Ploug, citing as an example the two centre-right pundits Eva and Rune Selsing, who in their book <em>Den Borgerlige Orden<\/em> [The Bourgeois Order] from 2022 call <em>The Second Sex<\/em> \u00bba blowtorch directed against bourgeois society\u00ab.<\/p>\n<p>Anna Cornelia Ploug somewhat ironically calls it ‘the bible of modern feminism’.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbYes, and that’s a terrible clich\u00e9. A real platitude.\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>But she will defend it, she says:<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbBecause it is also the case with the Bible that many have it on their shelves, but how many have actually read it? People think they know what it says, and there are a lot of rumours about what it says. Great conflicts, wars and battles are fought over it. But in many ways, it’s also just a symbol.\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>It is the same with <em>The Second Sex<\/em>. There is disagreement about the interpretation of the book, and its arguments are often oversimplified.<\/p>\n<p>Most people will be familiar with the idea that \u00bbyou are not born a woman, you become one.\u00ab It is often cited as the book’s most important sentence and as a one-liner about gender being the result of a series of performative actions.<\/p>\n<p>But according to Anna Cornelia Ploug, this is a misunderstanding of the sentence itself, and is actually not the book’s main point at all.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbI don’t believe the sentence is just about an individual’s gradual gendering process, as it is often interpreted,\u00ab she says.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbWhat it actually expresses is that becoming a ‘woman’ means taking on a logical position where your autonomy as a free human being is in opposition to being a gendered being.\u00ab<\/p>\n<h1>The lived experience<\/h1>\n<p>As the book’s title also indicates, Beauvoir’s analysis is that while the man is the norm, the woman is the other. The woman becomes the object that enables the man to create himself as a subject.<\/p>\n<p>In this way, the woman is never something in her own right, but only by virtue of her relationship with the man. And it is precisely this idea of ‘otherness’ that would be of great importance to later thinkers.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbThe book helps establish what we now know as Women’s Studies, which becomes Gender Studies, and then related subjects like Critical Race Studies, and later Queer Studies and Disability Studies. In a way, it lays the foundation for a whole new way of thinking,\u00ab says Ploug.<\/p>\n<p>Beauvoir reaches her conclusions by reviewing the view of what a woman is in biology, religion, philosophy, psychoanalysis and literature. But one of the things she also does is include women’s lived experience in her analysis.<\/p>\n<p>In this way, the book contributes to a ‘turn towards concrete experience’ \u2013 where philosophy begins to take an interest in precisely the lived experience of people.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbThis along with another important book actually written by Beauvoir’s personal friend, Frantz Fanon,\u00ab says Ploug.<\/p>\n<p>The book she mentions here is the postcolonial thinker and revolutionary Frantz Fanon’s book Black Skin, White Masks, which was written in 1952 and at the same time as <em>The Second Sex<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>It is about Fanon\u2019s experience of being racialized in Paris after traveling to France from the French colony of Martinique.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbInstead of the woman, in Fanon ‘the other’ is the Black, it is the otherness of the Colonized and the Racialized that he shines a light on. But the dialectical way of thinking is the same, and they both form the cornerstones of the critical disciplines,\u00ab says Ploug.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbIt’s great that this book is finally in Danish,\u00ab she adds, referring to its recent first-time Danish-language publication.<\/p>\n<h1>It’s all about critique<\/h1>\n<p>A key question in Gender Studies and in similar theoretical approaches is which methodological approach is politically useful. Should we fight for equality, or for liberation, inclusion and overthrow of the system itself?<\/p>\n<p>And here Beauvoir’s work reminds us of the critique as a method, Anna Cornelia Ploug reckons.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbFeminism has become so mainstream that almost everyone is now a feminist\u00ab says Anna Cornelia Ploug.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Feminist thinking is a critique in itself, in its essence. It is not that women should have more board positions<\/p>\n<p class=\"quotee\">Anna Cornelia Ploug, postdoc at NorS<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u00bbAnd we’re happy about that \u2014 that’s what we work for \u2014 but of course there is a downside to this.\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>The downside is that the concept risks being watered down and we forget what feminist practice actually consists of: Namely, to analyse and break down the structures in society that keep people stuck in unfreedom.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbIt is important to remember. Feminist thought is its essence critique. It is not that women should have more board positions.\u00ab<\/p>\n<p><em>The Second Sex<\/em> is not a political manifesto, Anna Cornelia Ploug says. A manifesto is a positive programme that presents a vision of how something should be: For example, that women should be paid the same as men.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbInstead of asking how women can access certain funds in the economic system, you should criticize the economy at its very root. Radically, fundamentally.\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>[Danish writer] Emma Holten is a good contemporary example, according to Ploug. In May, she published a book called <em>Underskud<\/em> [Deficit], which criticizes the current economic system for not taking the value of caregiving into account.<\/p>\n<p>Another example could be the discussion of canonic lists in different disciplines. That is, whether there should be more women or other underrepresented groups in the literary or cultural canon, for example.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbBut why do we even have a canon at all? Is it set in stone or what’s going on? We have to break that order,\u00ab Ploug says.<\/p>\n<p>Beauvoir does not say anything concrete about how things should be. She provides a tool for analysing and conducting an ideological critique of society as it actually appears. It is not about giving directions, but about giving a correct description of the current system.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbAnd it is then up to the acting political subject to act against it.\u00ab<\/p>\n<h1>Gender is and will remain a problem<\/h1>\n<p>It is therefore not the answers that Beauvoir offers herself in her work, but rather the method by which she reaches them, that continues to make the work relevant today.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbIt’s not so much about the woman per se. It’s about the woman as a prism to point to gender as a problem in the first place.\u00ab<\/p>\n<p><em>Will people be provoked by this nowadays \u2014 when many people speak of multiple genders \u2014 that precisely women should be the prism?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u00bbYes, yes. And she probably isn’t a prism nowadays. But she was \u2013 as that’s where the zeitgeist was at the time. And we couldn’t have done without this contribution.\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>You shouldn’t grab and open <em>The Second Sex<\/em>, take the book’s concept of woman and go out and make a new women’s movement for 2024 on that basis, according to Ploug. The book should be used as a philosophical-critical toolbox instead.<\/p>\n<p>Being a gendered being \u2013 whether you call yourself a woman, non-binary or something else \u2013 still contains inherent conflicts that we will continue to have to deal with. And Beauvoir helps us see that.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbWe need to insist on the unfinished project. Instead of believing that the problem will be solved if only we adopt the liberal stance that everyone is free to choose his or her own identity. This is not taking gender seriously as a problem.\u00ab<\/p>\n<p><em>And that’s why we should read The Second Sex now?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u00bbYes. Among other reasons. There are many reasons to read it!,\u00ab the Beauvoir fan laughs.<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbBut you have to remember that what we can use the book for these days, is not for its ‘results’, if you can put it that way. It is for its method.\u00ab<\/p>\n"},{"acf_fc_layout":"ArticleEnd"},{"acf_fc_layout":"Newsletter","lang_select":"en","identifier":"Newsletter","headline":"Get an email with our top stories","button_text":"Sign up here","class":""},{"acf_fc_layout":"OtherStories","headline":"","hand_picked_posts":false,"references":false,"category":false,"theme":false,"number_of_posts":"4","style":"default"}]},"taxonomyData":{"category":[{"term_id":46,"name":"Science","slug":"science","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":46,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":831,"filter":"raw"}],"post_tag":[{"term_id":7519,"name":"75 \u00e5r","slug":"75-aar-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":7519,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":7520,"name":"anna cornelia ploug","slug":"anna-cornelia-ploug-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":7520,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":7521,"name":"beauvoir","slug":"beauvoir-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":7521,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":7522,"name":"bibelen","slug":"bibelen-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":7522,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":7523,"name":"det andet k\u00f8n","slug":"det-andet-koen-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":7523,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":5459,"name":"feminisme","slug":"feminisme-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":5459,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":7524,"name":"hovedv\u00e6rk","slug":"hovedvaerk-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":7524,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":1948,"name":"Jubil\u00e6um","slug":"jubilaeum-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":1948,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":1255,"name":"kritik","slug":"kritik-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":1255,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":3,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":7525,"name":"simone de beauvoir","slug":"simone-de-beauvoir-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":7525,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"}],"post_format":[],"expression":[{"term_id":15,"name":"News Article","slug":"news_article","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":15,"taxonomy":"expression","description":"","parent":0,"count":11488,"filter":"raw"}],"translation_priority":[{"term_id":5468,"name":"Optional","slug":"optional-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":5468,"taxonomy":"translation_priority","description":"","parent":0,"count":672,"filter":"raw"}]},"featured_media_url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eftertryk_magasin_beauvoir_illustration.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/100"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=171312"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171312\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":174668,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171312\/revisions\/174668"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/174663"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=171312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=171312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=171312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}