{"id":44963,"date":"2017-02-23T10:38:16","date_gmt":"2017-02-23T09:38:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/folketinget-splittet-debat-om-bederum\/"},"modified":"2017-02-28T10:23:25","modified_gmt":"2017-02-28T09:23:25","slug":"parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/","title":{"rendered":"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Danish People’s Party (DF) has for some months sought to close<\/a> the so-called prayer rooms<\/secret> at Danish education institutions.<\/p>\n

According to Marie Krarup, member of parliament for DF and the prime mover in the party’s campaign against the rooms, the prayer rooms are ‘in fact Islam’, and they are in conflict with Denmark’s status as a Christian country.<\/p>\n

Tuesday 21st February and the Danish parliament debated a proposal by the Danish People’s Party to outlaw the spaces. Although DF did not get any of the other parties’ support for their proposals (in this round, see below), it was a debate that revealed a rich variety of attitudes towards religion in the public sphere.
\n
\nSocial Democrat Party (S) spokesman in this case, Mattias Tesfaye, told parliament that S agreed with DF that there should be no praying in public institutions.<\/p>\n

“We must protect young people against social control from their peers,” he said.<\/p>\n

Of course you should be able to sing a Christian hymn at Danish educational institutions. Otherwise it would be ridiculous.<\/p>\n

Mattias Tesfaye<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Mattias Tesfaye also said that he had received reports from school principals in the western outskirts of Copenhagen who had closed their institutions\u2019 prayer rooms as they caused problems for young Muslims, who did not necessarily want to pray during the day, but felt pressured to do so by their peers.<\/p>\n

But Tesfaye also said that a decision to remove religious preaching and praying from public institutions should not only include Islam.<\/p>\n

“Any changes will apply to all religions,” he said. “What matters is that there is no preaching and prayer rooms at Danish educational institutions.”<\/p>\n

It was not clear Tuesday where the Social Democrats drew the line in terms of permissible religion in the public sphere. Primary schools, for example, facilititate the practice of religion by Christians by making space for confirmation classes and by taking pupils to services up to Christmas.<\/p>\n

Member of parliament for DF Karina Adsb\u00f8l asked Tesfaye, whether the Social Democrats would also “ban hymns before Christmas”.\u00a0 He replied, “Of course you should be able to sing a Christian hymn at Danish educational institutions. Otherwise it would be ridiculous.”<\/p>\n

Conservatives: It should not harm the Christians<\/h3>\n

For the Conservative Party (K), the protection of the Christians’ right to practice their religion the reason why they would not support the DF proposal.<\/p>\n

K’s education spokeswoman Brigitte Klintskov Jerkel said that a ban could cause problems for those who wanted to “live the Christian faith upon which our society is based.” She mentioned, as an example, a group that could get into trouble, namely a group of Christian students at the Faculty of Law at the University of Copenhagen.<\/p>\n

Marie Krarup from DF replied that she had never heard of Christians wanting a prayer room. “What would you do with it? I do not see that a ban on prayer rooms<\/secret> would harm Christian students,” she said.<\/p>\n

 
\n<\/p>\n

Government: Education institutions should decide<\/h3>\n

Liberal Alliance (LA) education spokesman Henrik Dahl said that “public institutions should be secular,” and that there is no need for “a higher level of religion,” than what was already available today.<\/p>\n

Still, the Liberal Alliance would not support DF’s proposal to close the prayer rooms by law, according to Dahl, because local educational institution heads should handle the issue themselves. This was the overall government parties\u2019 position, (where the Conservative spokesman’s position of protecting Christians’ right to practice fits, is open to interpretation).<\/p>\n

The Minister for Education from LA Merete Riisager<\/secret> said that she and the Minister for Research and Higher Education S\u00f8ren Pind (V) will advise the heads of education institutions on how to handle problems of religious controlling.<\/p>\n

It will, ironically in consideration of the topic, take the form of a pastoral letter, that in its traditional sense is a letter from a bishop to be read aloud from the pulpits of the diocese.<\/p>\n

Merete Riisager could not inform parliament on the contents of the pastoral letter.<\/p>\n

We will put forward a new resolution, which is not directed against Islam, although of course it is about Islam. In this way we will at least have the Social Democrats with us,<\/p>\n

Marie Krarup<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The Socialist People’s Party (SF) turned out \u2013 like the government parties \u2013 to want to let the question of prayer rooms be up to the local education institutions. SF\u2019s education spokesman Jacob Mark said that he was neither a supporter of prayer rooms nor confirmation classes at school, but that he was convinced that local solutions to any problems with the prayer rooms could be found.<\/p>\n

There is no “burning platform,” Mark said, while making it clear at the same time that he was ready to examine the question of prayer rooms more thoroughly.<\/p>\n

Carolina Magdalene Maier from the Alternative Party said that she personally had good experiences with a quiet room, as this had been organized on a former workplace of hers.<\/p>\n

She called it an expression of “magnanimity and liberality\u201d, that you held confidence in students and staff being able to live as they liked. “What is the problem?” said Maier.<\/p>\n

The Social Liberal Party spokeswoman Lotte Rod said that “this is all about DF wanting to ban everything that is Muslim.”<\/p>\n

“If you do this, should you not also ban student priests?” she said.<\/p>\n

Krarup: Will set forth a new resolution<\/h3>\n

Marie Krarup, who had wanted the law against prayer rooms, said to the University Post after the debate at Christiansborg that she found the Social Democrat Party’s position in support of a closure of prayer rooms without voting for DF’s proposal as \u201claughable\u201d.<\/p>\n

“We are against prayer rooms, but we will just not do anything about it. Hello there!” said Krarup characterizing Social Democrat policy.<\/p>\n

She also said that the Danish parliament was marked by “a paralysis that makes you upset.”<\/p>\n

What is the next move?<\/em><\/p>\n

“We will put forward a new resolution, which is not directed against Islam, although of course it is about Islam. In this way we will at least have the Social Democrats with us,” said Marie Krarup.
\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Remember the UCPH prayer room out in what they used to call KUA? Now parliament has spent an afternoon discussing whether it (and similar spaces) should be banned.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":44807,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[277,287,288,278],"class_list":["post-44963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-bederum","tag-bederum-en","tag-folketinget-en","tag-folketinget","expression-feature_article"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\nParliament split in debate over prayer rooms<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Remember the UCPH prayer room out in what they used to call KUA? Now parliament has spent an afternoon discussing whether it (and similar spaces) should be banned.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"University Post\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uniavis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/christoffer.zieler\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-23T09:38:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-28T09:23:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"898\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"442\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Christoffer Zieler\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Uniavisen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Uniavisen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Christoffer Zieler\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Christoffer Zieler\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a96cc389f544930451424dd312b34b8c\"},\"headline\":\"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-23T09:38:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-28T09:23:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1129,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/krarup.png\",\"keywords\":[\"bederum\",\"bederum\",\"Folketinget\",\"Folketinget\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Politics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/\",\"name\":\"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/krarup.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-23T09:38:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-28T09:23:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a96cc389f544930451424dd312b34b8c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/krarup.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/krarup.png\",\"width\":898,\"height\":442,\"caption\":\"Marie Krarup fik ikke vedtaget sit beslutningsforslag om at lukke landets offentlige bederum, men bederum var talk of the town 21. februar 2017 - og slaget om (ikke-kristen) religion i det offentlige rum er ikke ovre.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/\",\"name\":\"University Post\",\"description\":\"Independent of management\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a96cc389f544930451424dd312b34b8c\",\"name\":\"Christoffer Zieler\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4bf8592c5d42f63ff76abd26557ba3887d83a2e784a2508b81d423cf582346fa?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4bf8592c5d42f63ff76abd26557ba3887d83a2e784a2508b81d423cf582346fa?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4bf8592c5d42f63ff76abd26557ba3887d83a2e784a2508b81d423cf582346fa?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Christoffer Zieler\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/christoffer.zieler\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/uniavisen.dk\\\/en\\\/author\\\/christoffer\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms","og_description":"Remember the UCPH prayer room out in what they used to call KUA? Now parliament has spent an afternoon discussing whether it (and similar spaces) should be banned.","og_url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/","og_site_name":"University Post","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uniavis","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/christoffer.zieler","article_published_time":"2017-02-23T09:38:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-28T09:23:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":898,"height":442,"url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Christoffer Zieler","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Uniavisen","twitter_site":"@Uniavisen","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Christoffer Zieler","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/"},"author":{"name":"Christoffer Zieler","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#\/schema\/person\/a96cc389f544930451424dd312b34b8c"},"headline":"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms","datePublished":"2017-02-23T09:38:16+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-28T09:23:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/"},"wordCount":1129,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","keywords":["bederum","bederum","Folketinget","Folketinget"],"articleSection":["Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/","url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/","name":"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","datePublished":"2017-02-23T09:38:16+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-28T09:23:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#\/schema\/person\/a96cc389f544930451424dd312b34b8c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","width":898,"height":442,"caption":"Marie Krarup fik ikke vedtaget sit beslutningsforslag om at lukke landets offentlige bederum, men bederum var talk of the town 21. februar 2017 - og slaget om (ikke-kristen) religion i det offentlige rum er ikke ovre."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/parliament-split-in-debate-over-prayer-rooms\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parliament split in debate over prayer rooms"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/","name":"University Post","description":"Independent of management","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/#\/schema\/person\/a96cc389f544930451424dd312b34b8c","name":"Christoffer Zieler","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4bf8592c5d42f63ff76abd26557ba3887d83a2e784a2508b81d423cf582346fa?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4bf8592c5d42f63ff76abd26557ba3887d83a2e784a2508b81d423cf582346fa?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4bf8592c5d42f63ff76abd26557ba3887d83a2e784a2508b81d423cf582346fa?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Christoffer Zieler"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/christoffer.zieler"],"url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/author\/christoffer\/"}]}},"advancedCustomFields":{"layout_group":[{"acf_fc_layout":"Headline","use_post_title":true,"headline":"","style":"classic","highlighted_words":"","text_size":"small"},{"acf_fc_layout":"Image","image":{"ID":44807,"id":44807,"title":"Marie Krarup i debat om bederum i folketingssalen","filename":"krarup.png","filesize":553415,"url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","link":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/folketinget-splittet-debat-om-bederum\/krarup\/","alt":"Marie Krarup siddende i folketingssalen,","author":"7","description":"","caption":"Marie Krarup fik ikke vedtaget sit beslutningsforslag om at lukke landets offentlige bederum, men bederum var talk of the town 21. februar 2017 - og slaget om (ikke-kristen) religion i det offentlige rum er ikke ovre.","name":"krarup","status":"inherit","uploaded_to":44720,"date":"2017-02-21 19:53:20","modified":"2017-02-21 20:00:39","menu_order":0,"mime_type":"image\/png","type":"image","subtype":"png","icon":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-includes\/images\/media\/default.png","width":898,"height":442,"sizes":{"thumbnail":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup-150x150.png","thumbnail-width":150,"thumbnail-height":150,"medium":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup-480x236.png","medium-width":480,"medium-height":236,"medium_large":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup-768x378.png","medium_large-width":768,"medium_large-height":378,"large":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","large-width":898,"large-height":442,"1536x1536":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","1536x1536-width":898,"1536x1536-height":442,"2048x2048":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","2048x2048-width":898,"2048x2048-height":442,"featured-soft":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup-290x143.png","featured-soft-width":290,"featured-soft-height":143,"featured-hard":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup-290x180.png","featured-hard-width":290,"featured-hard-height":180,"narrow":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup-700x345.png","narrow-width":700,"narrow-height":345,"extended":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","extended-width":898,"extended-height":442}},"style":"full","text_placement":"metadata-below","image_link_url":"","image_link_title":"","caption_prefix":"","enable_alternative_caption":true,"alternative_caption":"Marie Krarup did not get parliament to adopt her resolution to close the country's public prayer rooms. But prayer rooms were the talk of the town 21st February 2017 - and the battle for (non-Christian) religion in the public sphere is not over."},{"acf_fc_layout":"Standfirst","subject":"","text":"Kan I huske KU's bederum ude p\u00e5 det, de kaldte KUA? Nu har Folketinget brugt en eftermiddag p\u00e5 at dr\u00f8fte, om det (og lignende rum) skal leve eller d\u00f8.","use_post_excerpt":true},{"acf_fc_layout":"Byline","is_author":true,"contributors":false},{"acf_fc_layout":"Content","content":"<p>The Danish People’s Party (DF) has for <a href=\"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/danish-peoples-party-wants-to-shut-down-university-of-copenhagen-prayer-room\/\">some months sought to close<\/a> the so-called <secret text=\"Premises that can be used for prayer and meditation, etc., not least for Muslims who want to pray during the day. At the University of Copenhagen the terms 'retreat room' and 'silence' are used to indicate that the premises do not belong to a particular faith\u2019s practitioners and that they can also be used for non-religious purposes.\">prayer rooms<\/secret> at Danish education institutions.<\/p>\n<p>According to Marie Krarup, member of parliament for DF and the prime mover in the party’s campaign against the rooms, the prayer rooms are ‘in fact Islam’, and they are in conflict with Denmark’s status as a Christian country.<\/p>\n<p>Tuesday 21st February and the Danish parliament debated a proposal by the Danish People’s Party to outlaw the spaces. Although DF did not get any of the other parties’ support for their proposals (in this round, see below), it was a debate that revealed a rich variety of attitudes towards religion in the public sphere.<\/p>\n"},{"acf_fc_layout":"Embed","url":"<div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div><script>(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = \"\/\/connect.facebook.net\/da_DK\/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.10\"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));<\/script><div class=\"fb-post\" data-href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/marie.krarup\/posts\/1352472314827395\" data-width=\"640\"><blockquote cite=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/marie.krarup\/posts\/1352472314827395\" class=\"fb-xfbml-parse-ignore\"><p>Nej til bederum. Danmark er et kristent land. Når rektor hejser flaget over skolen, kan han ikke selv bestemme om der...<\/p>Opsl\u00e5et af <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/marie.krarup\">Marie Krarup<\/a> p\u00e5 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/marie.krarup\/posts\/1352472314827395\">21. februar 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><\/div>","headline":"Marie Krarup on Facebook 21st February","caption":"\"No to prayer rooms. Denmark is a Christian country\""},{"acf_fc_layout":"Content","content":"<p>Social Democrat Party (S) spokesman in this case, Mattias Tesfaye, told parliament that S agreed with DF that there should be no praying in public institutions.<\/p>\n<p>“We must protect young people against social control from their peers,” he said.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Of course you should be able to sing a Christian hymn at Danish educational institutions. Otherwise it would be ridiculous.<\/p>\n<p class=\"quotee\">Mattias Tesfaye<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Mattias Tesfaye also said that he had received reports from school principals in the western outskirts of Copenhagen who had closed their institutions\u2019 prayer rooms as they caused problems for young Muslims, who did not necessarily want to pray during the day, but felt pressured to do so by their peers.<\/p>\n<p>But Tesfaye also said that a decision to remove religious preaching and praying from public institutions should not only include Islam.<\/p>\n<p>“Any changes will apply to all religions,” he said. “What matters is that there is no preaching and prayer rooms at Danish educational institutions.”<\/p>\n<p>It was not clear Tuesday where the Social Democrats drew the line in terms of permissible religion in the public sphere. Primary schools, for example, facilititate the practice of religion by Christians by making space for confirmation classes and by taking pupils to services up to Christmas.<\/p>\n<p>Member of parliament for DF Karina Adsb\u00f8l asked Tesfaye, whether the Social Democrats would also “ban hymns before Christmas”.\u00a0 He replied, “Of course you should be able to sing a Christian hymn at Danish educational institutions. Otherwise it would be ridiculous.”<\/p>\n<h3>Conservatives: It should not harm the Christians<\/h3>\n<p>For the Conservative Party (K), the protection of the Christians’ right to practice their religion the reason why they would not support the DF proposal.<\/p>\n<p>K’s education spokeswoman Brigitte Klintskov Jerkel said that a ban could cause problems for those who wanted to “live the Christian faith upon which our society is based.” She mentioned, as an example, a group that could get into trouble, namely a group of Christian students at the Faculty of Law at the University of Copenhagen.<\/p>\n<p>Marie Krarup from DF replied that she had never heard of Christians wanting a prayer room. “What would you do with it? I do not see that a ban on <secret text=\"The retreat room on South Campus of the University of Copenhagen was actually opened after lobbying from an interfaith group of students and the former student minister Hans Anker J\u00f8rgensen.\">prayer rooms<\/secret> would harm Christian students,” she said.<\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n"},{"acf_fc_layout":"Embed","url":"<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"da\" dir=\"ltr\">Bederumsdebatten er symbolpolitik, der fratager lederne i det offentlige ansvaret og signalerer mistillid til deres evner. Nej herfra <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/dkpol?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#dkpol<\/a><\/p>— Jakob Engel-Schmidt (@engelschmidt) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/engelschmidt\/status\/833921998489280512?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">February 21, 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>","headline":"","caption":"\"Politics of symbolism\" Education spokesman Jakob Engel-Schmidt expresses the Liberal Party line on Twitter"},{"acf_fc_layout":"Content","content":"<h3>Government: Education institutions should decide<\/h3>\n<p>Liberal Alliance (LA) education spokesman Henrik Dahl said that “public institutions should be secular,” and that there is no need for “a higher level of religion,” than what was already available today.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the Liberal Alliance would not support DF’s proposal to close the prayer rooms by law, according to Dahl, because local educational institution heads should handle the issue themselves. This was the overall government parties\u2019 position, (where the Conservative spokesman’s position of protecting Christians’ right to practice fits, is open to interpretation).<\/p>\n<p>The Minister for Education from LA <secret url=\"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/riisager-290x180.png\" text=\"\">Merete Riisager<\/secret> said that she and the Minister for Research and Higher Education S\u00f8ren Pind (V) will advise the heads of education institutions on how to handle problems of religious controlling.<\/p>\n<p>It will, ironically in consideration of the topic, take the form of a pastoral letter, that in its traditional sense is a letter from a bishop to be read aloud from the pulpits of the diocese.<\/p>\n<p>Merete Riisager could not inform parliament on the contents of the pastoral letter.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We will put forward a new resolution, which is not directed against Islam, although of course it is about Islam. In this way we will at least have the Social Democrats with us,<\/p>\n<p class=\"quotee\">Marie Krarup<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The Socialist People’s Party (SF) turned out \u2013 like the government parties \u2013 to want to let the question of prayer rooms be up to the local education institutions. SF\u2019s education spokesman Jacob Mark said that he was neither a supporter of prayer rooms nor confirmation classes at school, but that he was convinced that local solutions to any problems with the prayer rooms could be found.<\/p>\n<p>There is no “burning platform,” Mark said, while making it clear at the same time that he was ready to examine the question of prayer rooms more thoroughly.<\/p>\n<p>Carolina Magdalene Maier from the Alternative Party said that she personally had good experiences with a quiet room, as this had been organized on a former workplace of hers.<\/p>\n<p>She called it an expression of “magnanimity and liberality\u201d, that you held confidence in students and staff being able to live as they liked. “What is the problem?” said Maier.<\/p>\n<p>The Social Liberal Party spokeswoman Lotte Rod said that “this is all about DF wanting to ban everything that is Muslim.”<\/p>\n<p>“If you do this, should you not also ban student priests?” she said.<\/p>\n<h3>Krarup: Will set forth a new resolution<\/h3>\n<p>Marie Krarup, who had wanted the law against prayer rooms, said to the University Post after the debate at Christiansborg that she found the Social Democrat Party’s position in support of a closure of prayer rooms without voting for DF’s proposal as \u201claughable\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>“We are against prayer rooms, but we will just not do anything about it. Hello there!” said Krarup characterizing Social Democrat policy.<\/p>\n<p>She also said that the Danish parliament was marked by “a paralysis that makes you upset.”<\/p>\n<p><em>What is the next move?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>“We will put forward a new resolution, which is not directed against Islam, although of course it is about Islam. In this way we will at least have the Social Democrats with us,” said Marie Krarup.<\/p>\n"},{"acf_fc_layout":"ArticleEnd"},{"acf_fc_layout":"Banner","img":false,"url":""},{"acf_fc_layout":"OtherStories","headline":"","hand_picked_posts":false,"references":false,"category":false,"theme":false,"number_of_posts":"4","style":"default"}],"expression":{"term_id":18,"name":"Feature Article","slug":"feature_article","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":18,"taxonomy":"expression","description":"","parent":0,"count":1200,"filter":"raw"},"enable_comments":true,"align_content":"alignleft","feature_color":"#d12b2b"},"taxonomyData":{"category":[{"term_id":48,"name":"Politics","slug":"politics","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":48,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":1035,"filter":"raw"}],"post_tag":[{"term_id":277,"name":"bederum","slug":"bederum","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":277,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":23,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":287,"name":"bederum","slug":"bederum-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":287,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":288,"name":"Folketinget","slug":"folketinget-en","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":288,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":3,"filter":"raw"},{"term_id":278,"name":"Folketinget","slug":"folketinget","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":278,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":23,"filter":"raw"}],"post_format":[],"expression":[{"term_id":18,"name":"Feature Article","slug":"feature_article","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":18,"taxonomy":"expression","description":"","parent":0,"count":1200,"filter":"raw"}],"translation_priority":[]},"featured_media_url":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/krarup.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44963"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44963\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45315,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44963\/revisions\/45315"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/44807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uniavisen.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}