Morphosyntax of complement clauses in East Caucasian languages: long-distance agreement

Natalia Serdobolskaya holder foredrag i Lingvistkredsen om komplementsætninger i østkaukasiske sprog med fokus på forskellige komplementeringsstrategier og langdistancekongruens.

Natalia Serdobolskaya er ph.d. fra Lomonosov Statsuniversitet i Moskva på en afhandling fra 2005 om raisingkonstruktioner og lignende konstruktioner i verdens sprog. Hun er nu lektor ved Det Russiske Statsuniversitet for Humaniora og i spidsen for typologilaboratoriet ved Moskvas Statsuniversitet for Uddannelse. Hendes vigtigste forskningsområder er differential object marking i uraliske sprog og komplementering. Hun er særlig interesseret i syntaktiske forhold vedr. raising og nomalisering i verdens sprog og i komplementsætningers semantik. Hun er forfatter til en række artikler om differential object marking og forskellige aspekter af komplementsætningssemantik, en af redaktørerne af bogen Finno-ugorskie yazyki: fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisaniya. Formal’nyi i funktsional’nyi podkhody [Finno-ugriske sprog: Fragmenter af grammatiske beskrivelser. Formelle og funktionelle tilgange] (2012) samt en af redaktørerne af online-ordbogen over besermandialekten af sproget udmurt.

Abstract

The East-Caucasian languages (Nakh-Daghestanian) are characterized by rich consonant systems, ergative case alignment and verbal agreement, complex gender systems, elaborate paradigm of locative cases, deictic demonstratives and preverbs. In syntax, they show a number of puzzling structures that are challenging from the theoretical point of view: non-finite clauses where all the arguments are encoded in the same way as in independent sentences, backward control, long-distance reflexive pronouns and long-distance agreement in complement clauses. This talk is focused on complementation in East Caucasian. First, I discuss the distribution of complementation strategies in Qunqi Dargwa. Then I focus on the phenomenon of long-distance agreement. The infinitives and converbs are the only complementation strategies that allow long-distance agreement. In Qunqi, there is a fuzzy boundary between infinitives and indirect mood forms. The converbs are used both with control verbs and with emotive and perception complement-taking verbs. The long-distance agreement pattern is only observed with control verbs. I show that these structures show properties of clause union. Then I consider the data of 19 East-Caucasian languages from Kibrik 2005 (Materials to the typology of ergativity), and discuss the long-distance agreement patterns in those languages. In most of these languages this phenomenon is limited to control constructions, while Tsez and Tsakhur deviate from this generalization.

Se mere på Lingvistkredsens hjemmeside.